EFFECTS OF POE ON PRE-SCHOOL STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING AND POE SKILLS
Apart from basic skills such as self-care and speaking, higher-order cognitive skills including inquiry, critical thinking, and scientific thinking can develop during early childhood. Thus, it is crucial to employ teaching methods that support the development of higher-order cognitive skills in these age groups and ensure that these children systematically use such skills.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of the POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) method on the POE and critical thinking skills during early childhood. In this context, 27 pre-school students participated in the study, which involved an experimental design and was carried out for six weeks. In the study, the data collected by using quantitative and qualitative data collection tools were analyzed using appropriate analysis methods. The researchers compared the effects of scientific experiments prepared in line with the POE and gamification on students' critical thinking skills through philosophical inquiry (CTSPI) and POE skills, and skills that constitute the sub-dimensions of these skills. The findings revealed that in early childhood education the POE was more effective than gamification in developing students' critical thinking and POE skills. Similarly, teachers participating in the research process thought that the POE was more effective than gamification in motivating students and turning their attention to teaching processes. Considering the results, the POE is recommended to be used in early childhood education, especially in transferring scientific content in the fields of science.
Keywords: Predict observe explain, critical thinking, early childhood education.
Akarsu, A. H. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler öğretiminde tahmin et-gözle-açıkla (TGA) uygulamaları [Predict-observe-explain (Poe) applicatıons in the teaching of social studies], (Doctoral dissertation). Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Institute of Social Sciences, Rize.
Alexander, D., Haysom, J., & Bowen, M. (2010). Predict, observe, explain: Activities enhancing scientific understanding. NSTA Press.
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
Arsy, H. I., Prasetyo, A. P. B., & Subali, B. (2019). Predict-observe-explain strategy with group investigation effect on students’ critical thinking skills and learning achievement. Journal of Primary Education, 8(4), 75-83.
Ayvacı, H. Ş. (2013). Investigating the effectiveness of predict-observe-explain strategy on teaching photo electricity topic. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(5), 548-564.Banawi, A., Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., & Solehuddin, M. (2019). Prospective primary school teachers' conception change on states of matter and their changes through predict-observe-explain strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 359-374.
Bilen, K., & Aydogdu, M. (2010). Using the predict-observe-explain (POE) strategy to teach of concepts photosynthesis and respiration in plants. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 7(14), 179-194.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Ravenio Books.
Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E., & Anderson, J. H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48(12), 1074-1079.
Dallal, G. E., & Wilkinson, L. (1986). An analytic approximation to the distribution of Lilliefors's test statistic for normality. The American Statistician, 40(4), 294-296.
Dunn, J., Bretherton, I., & Munn, P. (1987). Conversations about feeling states between mothers and their young children. Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 132-139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1622.214.171.124
Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research in (pp.67-70). Dordre-cht: Springer.
Green, S. B., Salkind, N. J., & Akey, T. M. (2005). Two related-samples tests: the McNemar, the Sign and the Wilcoxon tests. In S. B. Green & N. J. Salkind (Eds.), Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh. Analyzing and Understanding Data (pp: 395-399). Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
Gunstone, R. F., & Champagne, A. B. (1990). Promoting conceptual change in the laboratory. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 159-182). London: Routledge.
Gullo, D. F. (2006). K today: Teaching and learning in the kindergarten year. National association for the education of young children. Washington, DC 22205-4101.
Güleşir, T., Aydemir, K., Kuş, S., Uzel, N. ve Gül, A. (2020). Fizyoloji deneyleri kapsamında alternatif bir değerlendirme yöntemi: TGA çalışma yaprakları [An alternative assessment method within the scope of physiology experiments: TGA worksheets]. e- Kafkas e-Caucasian Journal of Educational Research, 7, 84-99.
Güngör, S. N., & Özkan, M. (2017). An evaluation of preservice science teachers’ views on predict-observe-explain (POE) method. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 82-95. doi: https://DOI:10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.5c3s6m
Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 129-144. doi: https://DOI:10.1080/09695949993044
Harman, G. (2014). Tahmin Gözlem Açıklama (TGA) Yöntemine dayalı bir laboratuvar etkinliği: Hücre zarından madde geçişi [A laboratory activity based on predictive observation description (TGA): Substance passage through cell membrane]. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 4(1), 15-32.
Harms, N. C., & Yager, R. E. (1980). What research says to the science teacher. Science education information report. 25 April 2021 retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED205367.pdf
Hilario, J. S. (2015). The use of predict-observe-explain-explore (POEE) as a new teaching strategy in general chemistry laboratory. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(2), 37-48.
Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2011). Facilitating preschoolers’ scientific knowledge construction via computer games regarding light and shadow: The effect of the prediction-observation-explanation (POE) strategy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 482-493. doi: https://DOI:10.1007/s10956-011-9298-z
Jacobson, W. J., & Bergman, A. B. (1980). Science for children: A book for teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jasdilla, L., Fitria, Y., & Sopandi, W. (2019). Predict observe explain (POE) strategy toward mental model of primary students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 022043.
Kara, E. (2017). Tahmin et-gözle-açıkla stratejisine dayalı fen öğretiminin ortaokul 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve başarısına etkisinin araştırılması [Investigation of the effect of science teaching based on guess-eye-explain strategy on the science process skills and success of secondary school 5th grade students] (Master's thesis). Marmara University, Istanbul.
Karadağ, F., Demirtaş, V. Y., & Yıldız, T. (2017). 5-6 yaş çocuklar için felsefi sorgulama yoluyla eleştirel düşünmenin değerlendirilmesi ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Development of critical thinking scale through philosophical inquiry for children 5-6 years old]. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4), 1025-1037.
Karadağ, F., & Demirtaş, V. Y. (2018). Çocuklarla felsefe öğretim programının okul öncesi dönemdeki çocukların eleştirel düşünme becerileri üzerindeki etkililiği [The effectiveness of the philosophy with children curriculum on critical thinking skills of pre-school children]. Education and Science, 43(195), 19-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7268
Karadeniz, A. (2019). TGA (tahmin et-gözle-açıkla) yöntemi destekli etkinliklerin lise öğrencilerinin üst biliş farkındalıkları üzerine etkisinin araştırılması [Investigating the effects of materials supported with poe (prediction-observation-explanation) method on high school students metacognition awareness], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
Köklükaya, A., & Yıldırım, G. E. (2018). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının suyun genleşmesi konusunu tahmin-gözlem-açıklama yöntemi ile açıklayabilme düzeyleri [Science teacher candidates’ expression levels on the expansion of water subject by prediction- observation- explanation method]. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Education, 2(1), 16-27.
Marek, E. A., & Cavallo, A. M. (1997). The learning cycle: Elementary school science and beyond. in (pp. 89-92). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Mercier, H., Bernard, S., & Clément, F. (2014). Early sensitivity to arguments: How preschoolers weight circular arguments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 125(1), 102-109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.011
Nana, S., Akhyar, M., & Rochsantiningsih, D. (2014). The development of predict, observe, explain, elaborate, write, and evaluate (POE2WE) learning model in physics learning at senior secondary school. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(19), 56-65.
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.
Özçelik, H. (2019). Kavram karikatürleri ile desteklenen tahmin et-gözle-açıkla (TGA) yönteminin ortaokul öğrencilerinin sorgulama becerileri, bilimsel süreç becerileri ve kavram öğrenmelerine etkisi [Examining the effect of predict-observe-explain (POE) method supported with concept cartoons on secondary school students' inquiry skills, sci̇ence process skills and conceptual understanding], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Marmara University, İstanbul.
Özdemir, H. (2011). Tahmin et-gözle-açıkla stratejisine dayalı laboratuvar uygulamalarının fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının asitler ve bazlar konusunu anlamalarına etkisi [Effect of laboratory activities designed based on “predict-observe-explain (Poe)” strategy on pre-sevice science teachers’ understanding of acid-base subject], (Unpublished Master Thesis). Pamukkale University, Institute of Science and Technology, Denizli.
Padilla, M. J. (1990). The science process skills. Research matters…to the science teacher. No. 9004. Reston, VA: National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). 15 June 2021 retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED266961
Palmer, D. (1995). The POE in the primary school: An evaluation. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 323-332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357405
Potts, B. (1994). Strategies for teaching critical thinking. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 4(3), 1-3. doi: https://doi.org/10.7275/hdhj-fc81
Ravanis, K., & Bagakis, G. (1998). Science education in kindergarten: sociocognitive perspective. International Journal of Early Years Education, 6(3), 315-327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966976980060306
Rini, A. P., Suryani, N., & Fadhilah, S. S. (2018). Development of predict observe explain (POE)-based thematic teaching materials. Al-Ta lim Journal, 25(3), 206-215. doi: https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.458067
Rosdianto, H., & Murdani, E. (2017). The implementation of POE (predict observe explain) model to improve student’s concept understanding on Newton’s law. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 55-57. https://doi.org/10.22611/jpf.v6i1.6899
Rusçuklu, P., & Özdilek, Z. (2019). Bütünleştirilmiş anlaşma halkaları ve TGA yönteminin çözünürlüğe etki eden faktörler konusundaki kavramsal anlamaya etkisi [The effect of integrated agreement circles and POE methods on conceptual understanding on factors of affecting the solubility]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(Special Issue), 621-648. doi: https://doi.org/10.17494/ogusbd.553783
Schönborn, K., Haglund, J., & Xie, C. (2014). Pupils' early explorations of thermoimaging to interpret heat and temperature. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(1), 118-132.
Sünkür, M. Ö. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji dersinde tahmin et-gözle-açıkla yöntemi ile desteklenmiş yansıtıcı düşünmeye dayalı etkinlik uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi [An assessment of the implementation of reflective thinking by supported predict-observe-explain method on science and technology course], (Unpublished Doctorate Thesis). İnönü University, Malatya.
Tiftikçi, H. İ., Yüksel, İ., Koç, A., & Çıbık, A. S. (2017). Tahmin gözlem açıklama yöntemine dayalı laboratuvar uygulamalarının elektrik akımı konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının giderilmesine ve başarıya etkisi [The effect of laboratory applications based on prediction observation explanation method to eliminate the misconceptions about electrical current and on success]. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 18(1), 19-29.
Treagust, D. F., Mthembu, Z., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2014). Evaluation of the predict-observe-explain instructional strategy to enhance students’ understanding of redox reactions. In I. Devetak, & S. A. Glazar (Eds.), Learning with understanding in the chemistry classroom (pp. 265-286). Netherlands: Springer.
Uyar, R. O., Genc, M. M. Y., & Yasar, M. (2018). Prospective preschool teachers' academic achievements depending on their goal orientations, critical thinking dispositions and self-regulation skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 601-613.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Prediction-observation-explanation. In R. White and R. F. Gunstone (Eds.), Probing Understanding (pp.44-64). London, UK: The Falmer Press.
Yaşar, Ş., & Baran, M. (2020). Oyunlarla desteklenmiş TGA (tahmin et-gözle-açıkla) yöntemine dayalı etkinliklerin 10. sınıf öğrencilerinin fizik başarısına etkisi [The effects of game-assisted activities based on the predict-observe-explain (POE) method on 10th-grade students’ physics achievement]. Marmara University Atatürk Education Faculty Journal of Educational Sciences, 52(52), 97-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.651074
Yavuz, S., & Çelik, G. (2013). The effect of predict-observe-explain (POE) technique on the misconceptions of prospective elementary teachers about the gases. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.46187
Zadunaisky, E. S. (2011). Argumentative discourse of kindergarten children: Features of peer talk and children-teacher talk. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(3), 248-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2011.580040
Zadunaisky, E. S., & Blum-Kulka, S. (2010). Peer talk as a ‘double opportunity space’: The case of argumentative discourse. Discourse & Society, 21(2), 211-233. doi: https://DOI:10.1177/0957926509353847
Copyright (c) 2021 International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) ISSN: 1300-915X
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and permissions
The manuscripts submitted to International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) for publication should be original studies that were not published before or not submitted to anywhere else for publication.
Authors who submit their manuscript to International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) should acknowledge that they agree to transfer the copyright of their studies to IOJPE. All Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
All articles published in International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Any further distribution or use of content published under CC BY 4.0 must contain the author(s) and the published article’s title, and journal citation. All articles published in IOJPE under a CC BY License may be used for Text and Data Mining purposes, subject to the conditions of the CC BY License terms. The license allows for commercial use. IOJPE allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator.
The journal’s objective is to disseminate articles published are free. Under the Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.00), the journal allows the user to permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, and even use the publication for commercial activities, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Open access is an approach that eases the interdisciplinary communication and encourages cooperation among different disciplines. IOJPE, therefore, contributes to its own field by providing more access to its articles and a more transparent review process.