THE EFFECT OF PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING ON PRE-SERVICE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS' CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING AND MISCONCEPTIONS
The aim of this research is to investigate the effect of problem-based learning on misconceptions and conceptual understanding regarding simple electric circuits. Participants are 54 pre-service primary school teachers enrolled on the Basic Science in Elementary School course at a state university. The research employs a nonequivalent control group model. The activity sheets containing problem-based scenarios prepared by the researcher were used in the experimental group. In the control group, the lecture-based learning supported by problem solving, question-answer, discussion activities and demonstration experiments was used. Data were gathered by three-tier Simple Electric Circuit Diagnostic Test consisting of 12 questions developed by Peşman (2005). The research revealed that problem-based learning is more effective in improving conceptual understanding and overcoming misconceptions than lecture-based learning.
Keywords: Problem-based learning, conceptual understanding, misconceptions, simple electric circuit, pre-service primary school teachers.
Abraham, M. R. (2005). Inquiry and the learning cycle approach. In N. J. Pienta, M. M. Cooper, & T. J. Greenbowe (Eds.), Chemists’ guide to effective teaching (pp. 41–52). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Afra, N. C., Osta, I., & Zoubeir, W. (2009). Students’ alternative conceptions about electricity and effect of inquiry-based teaching strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9106-7
Ahied, M., & Ekapti, R. F. (2020). Conceptual understanding of pressure concept through problem based learning in junior high school grade 8th. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/4/042120
Akınoğlu, O., & Tandoğan, R. Ö. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75375
Altun, S. (2009). Üç aşamalı bir testle fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının basit elektrik devreleri konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının tespiti [Determination of prospective science teachers’ misconceptions of simple electric circuits issue with three-stage test]. Bayburt University Journal of Education Faculty, 4(1), 72-79.
Alwan, A. A. (2011). Misconception of heat and temperature among physics students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 600-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.074
Anggoro, S., Widodo, A., Suhandi, A., & Treagust, D. F. (2019). Using a discrepant event to facilitate preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual change about force and motion. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/105275
Arı, Ü., Peşman, H., & Baykara, O. (2017). Sorgulamaya dayalı öğretimde rehberlik düzeyinin fen bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının kavram yanılgılarını iyileştirmedeki etkisinin bilimsel süreç becerileriyle etkileşimi [Interaction of effect upon remediating prospective science teachers’ misconceptions by guidance level in inquiry teaching with science process skills]. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(1), 304-321.
Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 2(4), 334-339. Retrieved from https://publications.waset.org/15369/pdf
Aydeniz, M., & Dogan, A. (2016). Exploring the impact of argumentation on pre-service science teachers' conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00170F
Aykutlu, I., & Şen, A. İ. (2012). Üç aşamalı test, kavram haritası ve analoji kullanılarak lise öğrencilerinin elektrik akımı konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının belirlenmesi [Determination of secondary school students’ misconceptions about the electric current using a three tier test, concept maps and analogies]. Education and Science, 37(166), 275-288.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966804
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education (Vol. 1). Broadway New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.
Bayram, A. (2010). Probleme dayalı öğrenme yönteminin ilköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersi “ısı ve sıcaklık” konusunda sahip oldukları kavram yanılgılarını gidermede etkisi [The effect of problem based learning on overcoming 5th grade students’ misconceptions about “heat and temperature”]. (Unpublished Master Thesis), Selçuk University, Konya.
Bilgin, I., Şenocak, E., & Sözbilir, M. (2009). The effects of problem-based learning instruction on university students’ performance of conceptual and quantitative problems in gas concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75267
Bostan Sarıoğlan, A., & Abacı, B. (2017). Sorgulamaya dayalı öğretimin “lamba parlaklığı” kavramının ortaokul 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin başarısına etkisi [The effect of inquiry based learning approach about "light bright" concept on 5th grade middle school students]. Journal of Balıkesir University Institute of Science and Technology, 19(3), 164-171.
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1997). Changing problem-based learning. Introduction to the second edition. In D. Boud, & G. Feletti, (Eds.), The challenge of problem based learning (2nd edition) (pp. 1-14). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Do students know what they know and what they don’t know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 313-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. A Project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 171-246). Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
Cantürk-Günhan, B. (2006). İlköğretim II. kademede matematik dersinde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin uygulanabilirliği üzerine bir araştırma [An investigation on applicability of problem based learning in the mathematics lesson at the second stage in the elementary education] (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
Cataloglu, E. (2002). Development and validation of an achievement test in introductory quantum mechanics: The quantum mechanics visualization instrument (QMVI) (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
Chen, C. H., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2007). The effect of web-based question prompts on scaffolding knowledge integration and ill-structured problem solving. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 359-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782487
Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The process and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon and L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2006). Problem‐based learning: Using ill‐structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90(1), 44-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20097
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th edition). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Cohen, R., Eylon, B., & Ganiel, U. (1983). Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts. American Journal of Physics, 51(5), 407-412. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.13226
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, Florida: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
Cronk, B. C. (2020). How to use SPSS: A step-by-step guide to analysis and interpretation (11th edition). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Dahlgren, M. A., & Öberg, G. (2001). Questioning to learn and learning to question: Structure and function of problem-based learning scenarios in environmental science education. Higher Education, 41(3), 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004138810465
Darmofal, D. L., Soderholm, D. H., & Brodeur. D. R. (2002, November). Using concept maps and concept questions to enhance conceptual understanding. 32nd Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Vol. 3, pp. T3A-1-T3A-6, 6-9 November 2002, Boston, MA.
De Grave, W. S., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Schmidt, H. G. (1996). Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science, 24(5), 321-341.
Demirezen, S., & Yağbasan, R. (2013). 7E modelinin basit elektrik devreleri konusundaki kavram yanılgıları üzerine etkisi [The effect of 7E model on misconceptions about simple electrical circuits]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2), 132-151.
Desstya, A., Prasetyo, Z. K., Suyanta, Susila, I., & Irwanto (2019). Developing an instrument to detect science misconception of an elementary school teacher. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 201-218.
diSessa, A. A. (2014). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd edition) (pp. 88–108). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Loyens, S. M. M., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087-1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2001). Solving problems with group work in problem‐based learning: Hold on to the philosophy. Medical Education, 35(9), 884-889.
Driver, R. (1981). Pupils’ alternative frameworks in science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528810030109
Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In B. J. Duch, S. E. Groh, & D. E. Allen (Eds.), The power of problem-based learning (pp. 3-11). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
Dupin, J. J., & Johsua, S. (1987). Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(9), 791-806. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240903
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1986). Essentials of educational measurement (4th edition). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students' understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98-115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1614813
Eren, C. D., & Akınoğlu, O. (2012). Fen eğitiminde probleme dayalı öğrenmenin kavram öğrenmeye etkisi [The effect of problem based learning on concept learning in science education]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(3), 19-32.
Erickson, D. K. (1999). A problem-based approach to mathematics instruction. The Mathematics Teacher, 92(6), 516-521.
Fadaei, S. S., & Mora, C. (2015). An investigation about misconceptions in force and motion in high school. US-China Education Review A, 5(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.01.004
Fadillah, A., & Salirawati, D. (2018). Analysis of misconceptions of chemical bonding among tenth grade senior high school students using a two-tier test. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021, 080002-1-080002-7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5062821
Fahmi, F., & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2017). The misconceptions of senior high school students in Banjarmasin on chemical bonding. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(17), 32-39.
Farrokhnia, M. R., & Esmailpour, A. (2010). A study on the impact of real, virtual and comprehensive experimenting on students’ conceptual understanding of DC electric circuits and their skills in undergraduate electricity laboratory. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5474-5482.
Fisher, K. M. (1985). A misconception in biology: Amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660220105
Fredette, N., & Lochhead, J. (1980). Student conceptions of simple circuits. Physics Teacher, 18(3), 194-198. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2340470
Gavalcante, P. S., Newton, D. P., & Newton, L. D. (1997). The effect of various kinds of lesson on conceptual understanding in science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(2), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150205
George, D., & Mallery, M. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th edition). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660412
Gooding, J., & Metz, B. (2011). From misconceptions to conceptual change: Tips for identifying and overcoming students' misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 78(4), 34-37.
Goodman, R. J. B. (2010). Problem-based learning: Merging of economics and mathematics. Journal of Economics and Finance, 34(4), 477-483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-010-9154-7
Gravetter, F. J., & Forzano, L. A. B. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (6th edition). Boston: Cangage Learning.
Günter, T., Akkuzu, N., & Alpat, Ş. (2017). Understanding ‘green chemistry’ and ‘sustainability’: An example of problem-based learning (PBL). Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(4), 500-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1353964
Hadjiachilleos, S., Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2013). The impact of cognitive and affective aspects of cognitive conflict on learners’ conceptual change about floating and sinking. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(2), 133‑152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2013.811074
Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056‑1065. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14031
Haslam, F., & Treagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1987.9654897
Helm, H. (1980). Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students. Physics Education, 15(2), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/15/2/308
Hendry, G. D., Frommer, M., & Walker, R. A. (1999). Constructivism and problem‐based learning. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23(3), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877990230306
Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller. The Physics Teacher, 33(8), 502-506. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344278
Hewson, M. G., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of instruction using students' prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 731-743. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660200804
Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. B. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051837
Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 541-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110506
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Iglesias, J. L. (2002). Problem-based learning in initial teacher education. Prospects, 32(3), 319-332. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022133529435
Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., & Veermans, K. (2011). A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation‐laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(1), 71-93.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504505
Kalaya, T., Nopparatjamjomras, S., Chitaree, R., & Nopparatjamjomras, T. R. (2019). Worksheet analysis for revealing students’ understanding of simple DC circuits. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1380. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1380/1/012164
Kırılmazkaya, G., & Kırbağ Zengin, F. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının fotosentez konusu hakkında kavram yanılgılarının vee diyagramı aracılığıyla belirlenmesi ve bu araca yönelik görüşlerinin tespiti [Determination of photosynthesis misconceptions’ through vee diyagrams and preservice teachers’ views towards these tools]. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 18(2), 1537-1563.
Klammer, J. (1998). An overview of techniques for identifying, acknowledging and overcoming alternate conceptions in physics education. Klingenstein Project Paper, Teachers College, Columbia University (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED423121).
Küçüközer, H., & Kocakülah, S. (2007). Secondary school students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 4(1), 101-115.
Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, S. S., Kim, J. W., Kwon, H. G., & Park, H. K. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary‐level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585-603. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099
Lohman, M. C., & Finkelstein, M. (2000). Designing groups in problem-based learning to promote problem-solving skill and self-directedness. Instructional Science, 28(4), 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003927228005
Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). Students' conceptions of constructivist learning: A comparison between a traditional and a problem-based learning curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11(4), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9015-5
Manunure, K., Delserieys, A., & Castéra, J. (2019). The effects of combining simulations and laboratory experiments on Zimbabwean students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(3), 289-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1629407
Marra, R. M., Jonassen, D. H., Palmer, B., & Luft, S. (2014). Why problem-based learning works: Theoretical foundations. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 221-238.
Millar, R., & King, T. (1993). Students’ understanding of voltage in simple series electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 15(3), 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150310
Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2011). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd edition). London: Routledge.
Mubarokah, F. D., Mulyani, S., & Indriyanti, N. Y. (2018). Identifying students’ misconceptions of acid-base concepts using a three-tier diagnostic test: A case of Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special), 51‑58. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10256a
Musal, B., Akalın, E., Kılıç, O., Esen, A, & Alıcı, E. (2002). Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi probleme dayalı öğretim programı, süreçleri ve eğitim yönlendiricilerinin rolü [PBL program, process and the roles of tutors in Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine]. The World of Medical Education, 9(9), 39-49.
Nangku, M. S., & Rohaeti, E. (2019). The effect of problem-based learning model toward students’ conceptual understanding and verbal communication skills in reaction rate learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012037
Narjaikaew, P. (2013). Alternative conceptions of primary school teachers of science about force and motion. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88, 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.503
Nie, Y., Xiao, Y., Fritchman, J. C., Liu, Q., Han, J., Xiong, J., & Bao, L. (2019). Teaching towards knowledge integration in learning force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16), 2271-2295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1672905
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A step-by-step guide to SPSS for sport and exercise studies. London: Routledge.
Peşman, H. (2005). Development of a three-tier to assess ninth grade students' misconceptions about simple electric circuits (Unpublished Master Thesis). Orta Doğu Teknik University, Ankara.
Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002
Picciarelli, V., Di Gennaro, M., Stella, R., & Conte, E. (1991). A study of university students' understanding of simple electric circuits part 1: Current in d.c. circuits. European Journal of Engineering Education, 16(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043799108939503
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., Aminah, N. S., & Affandy, H. (2019). Problem-based learning with argumentation skills to improve students’ concept understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012065
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Reynolds, J. M., & Hancock, D. R. (2010). Problem‐based learning in a higher education environmental biotechnology course. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703291003718919
Roh, K. H. (2003). Problem-based learning in mathematics. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science Mathematics and Environmental Education, Columbus, OH. EDO-SE-03-07. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED482725).
Rohmah, F., Pramono, S. E., & Yusuf, A. (2020). Problem based learning assisted by mobile learning to improve conceptual understanding of primary school students. Educational Management, 9(1), 51-58.
Roth, K. J. (1990). Developing meaningful conceptual understanding in science. In B. F. Jones, & L. Idol, (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 139- 175). Broadway Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sahin, M. (2010). Effects of problem-based learning on university students’ epistemological beliefs about physics and physics learning and conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(3), 266-275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9198-7
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Schmidt, H. G., De Volder, M. L., De Grave, W. S., Moust, J. H. C., & Patel, V. L. (1989). Explanatory models in the processing of science text: The role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 610- 619.
Schoon, K. J., & Boone, W. J. (1998). Self‐efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199809)82:5<553::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-8
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31-56). New York, NY: Routledge.
Setyani, N. D., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Handhika, J. (2017). Students conception and perception of simple electrical circuit. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012051
Shepardson, D. P., & Moje, E. B. (1994). The nature of fourth graders' understandings of electric circuits. Science Education, 78(5), 489-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780505
Shipstone, D. (1988). Pupils' understanding of simple electrical circuits. Some implications for instruction. Physics Education, 23(2), 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/23/2/004
Smith, E. L., Blakeslee, T. D., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300202
Soeharto, S., Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649
Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: As authentic as it gets. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 25-28.
Suciatmoko, P. M., Suparmi, A., & Sukarmin, S. (2018). An analysis of students’ conceptual understanding: How do students understand some electricity concepts?. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2014(1), 20154-1-20154-6. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054558
Suliyanah, Putri, H. N. P. A., & Rohmawati, L. (2018). Identification student’s misconception of heat and temperature using three-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012035
Suryadi, A., Kusairi, S., & Husna, D. A. (2020). Comparative study of secondary school students' and pre-service teachers' misconception about simple electric circuit. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 16(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v16i2.21909
Şen, Ş., & Yılmaz, A. (2017). The development of a three-tier chemical bonding concept test. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 110-126.
Şenyiğit, Ç. (2020). Sorgulama temelli öğrenmenin sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının bilimsel süreç becerilerine ve kavramsal anlamalarına etkisi [The effect of inquiry-based learning on elementary school teacher candidates' scientific process skills and conceptual understanding] (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th edition). NY: Pearson.
Tahir, F. M., Nasri, N. M., & Halim, L. (2020). The effectiveness of predict-observe-explain-animation (poe-a) strategy to overcome students’ misconceptions about electric circuits concepts. Learning Science and Mathematics Journal, 15, 1-15.
Tarhan, L., & Acar, B. (2007). Problem‐based learning in an eleventh grade chemistry class: ‘Factors affecting cell potential’. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 351-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701535299
Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K–16 education (2nd edition). Alexandria, Virginia USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204
Türkoğuz, S., & Cin, M. (2013). Argümantasyona dayalı kavram karikatürü etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin kavramsal anlama düzeylerine etkisi [Effects of argumentation based concept cartoon activities on students' conceptual understanding levels]. Dokuz Eylül University the Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 35, 155-173.
Uden, L., & Beaumont, C. (2006). Technology and problem-based learning. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Ula, W. R. R., Supardi, K. I., & Sulhadi, S. (2018). The implementation of problem based learning with mind mapping to improve the student’s understanding of concept. Journal of Primary Education, 7(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPE.V7I2.23089
Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students' argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952-977. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20358
Villarino, G. N. B. (2018). Students’ alternative conceptions and patterns of understanding on electric circuits. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(4), 49-70.
Wardani, S., Nurhayati, S., & Hardiyanti, P. C. (2017). The effectiveness of problem based learning model to improve conceptual understanding and intrapersonal skill. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(5), 1576-1580.
West, S. G., Biesanz, J. C., & Pitts, S. C. (2000). Casual inference and generalization in field settings: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. In H. T. Reis, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd edition) (pp. 40-84). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., & Mulyani, S. (2017). Undergraduate students’ misconception on acid-base and argentometric titrations: A challenge to implement multiple representation learning model with cognitive dissonance strategy. International Journal of Education (IJE), 9(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v9i2.5464
Widodo, W., Rosdiana, L., Fauziah, A. M., & Suryanti (2018). Revealing student’s multiple-misconception on electric circuits. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012088
Wild, T. A., Hilson, M. P., & Hobson, S. M. (2013). The conceptual understanding of sound by students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 107(2), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1310700204
Wood, D. F. (2003). ABC of learning and teaching in medicine-Problem based learning. BMJ, 328-330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7384.328
Zacharia, Z. C., & de Jong, T. (2014). The effects on students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits of introducing virtual manipulatives within a physical manipulatives-oriented curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 32(2), 101-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.887083
Zahro, R., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). The effect of web-assisted problem based learning model on physics conceptual understanding of 10th grade students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012058
Zhiqing, Z. (2015). Assimilation, accommodation, and equilibration: A schema-based perspective on translation as process and as product. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 11(1-2), 84-89.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and permissions
The manuscripts submitted to International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) for publication should be original studies that were not published before or not submitted to anywhere else for publication.
Authors who submit their manuscript to International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) should acknowledge that they agree to transfer the copyright of their studies to IOJPE. All Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
All articles published in International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Any further distribution or use of content published under CC BY 4.0 must contain the author(s) and the published article’s title, and journal citation. All articles published in IOJPE under a CC BY License may be used for Text and Data Mining purposes, subject to the conditions of the CC BY License terms. The license allows for commercial use. IOJPE allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator.
The journal’s objective is to disseminate articles published are free. Under the Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.00), the journal allows the user to permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, and even use the publication for commercial activities, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Open access is an approach that eases the interdisciplinary communication and encourages cooperation among different disciplines. IOJPE, therefore, contributes to its own field by providing more access to its articles and a more transparent review process.