MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT PERIODICITY IN SECONDARY CHEMISTRY EDUCATION: THE CASE OF KAZAKHSTAN

Authors

  • Yılmaz Satılmış Suleyman Demirel University, Education Department, Almaty, Kazakhstan

Abstract

Determining students’ misconceptions in chemistry is important for an effective teaching and learning chemistry. In this study we determine misconception about periodicity and help students to prevent developing erroneous ideas about periodicity. The sample of this study consists of 137 questionnaires who were secondary school`s students and the test was developed after two step application on questionnaires. A questionnaire, including multiple choice and true-false format with 7 items was applied to total of 116 eight-year and nine-year secondary school`s students who attended at gymnasium schools. The collected data was analyzed using data analysis technique in six categories (the meaning of periodicity, the determinative factors of periodic properties or periodicity, the relation between periodic properties and the number of subatomic particles, the meaning of period, periodic properties and the forms of periodic table). According to the all results, main reasons of erroneous ideas are the lack of teaching method that presenting only Mendeleev`s periodic table (short form), no exercises about periodic properties and the meaning of periodicity cannot be focused as a subject during the teaching process.

Keywords: Teaching Secondary Chemistry, Misconception, Periodicity, Periodic Propertie.

REFERENCES

Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understanding and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 105-120.

Barke H.D., Al-Hazari, Yitbarek S., (2009) Misconceptions in Chemistry. Springer, 21.

Beck, I.L& McKeown, M.G. (1991) Conditions of Vocabulary Acquisition.The Handbook of Reading Research, Cilt 2. New York.

Bolmgren, I. (1995). Presenting the periodic system with pictures. Journal of Chemical Education, 72, 337-338.

Disessa, A. and Sherin, B., (1998), “What changes in conceptual change”, İnternational Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155.

Dreyfuss, D. (2000). Journal of Chemical Education, Vol.77, 434.

Goh, N. K., & Chia, L. S. (1989). Using the learning cycle to introduce periodicity. Journal of Chemical Education, 66, 747-749.

Herron, J.D. (1996) The Chemistry Classroom. Formulas for Successful Teaching, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.

Knight, P.R.Jr. (2003).  High School Chemistry Students’ Learning of the elements, structure and periodicity of the periodic table: contributions of inquiry-based activities and exemplary graphics, a dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University.

Lehman, J. R., Koran, J. J., & Koran, M. L. (1984).Interaction of learner characteristics with learning from three models of the periodic table. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 885-893.

Nakhleh M. B., (1992), Why some students don’t learn chemistry? Chemical misconceptions, Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 191-196.

Novak, J. D. ve Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pfundt,H. (1982). Pre-instructional conceptions about transformations of substances. Chimica Didactica, 3 ,25.

Sisovic, D. ve Bojovic, S. (2000). On the use of  concept maps at different stages of chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe. Vol. 1, No. 1,135-144.

Spada, H. (1994). “Conceptual change or multiple representations”, Learning and Instruction, 4, 113.

Taber, K. S. (2001). Constructing Chemical Concepts in The Classroom?: Using Research To Inform Practice. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe. 2(1), 43-51.

Tejada, S., & Palacios, J. (1995). Chemical elements bingo. Journal of Chemical Education, 72, 1115-1116.

Trifonov D.N. (1971). On Quantitative Interpretation of Periodicity, Nauka Publ.:Moscow (in Russian).

Downloads

Published

2014-12-31

Issue

Section

Research Article