ROBOTICS IN EDUCATION, AN APPROACH TO TECHNICAL SUBJECTS BASED IN PROJECTS

Authors

  • Sonia VAL University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
  • Jorge PASTOR University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
  • Gonzalo ROBLES University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

Abstract

This work aims to explore the effect of work based on projects graded at different levels of complexity in the area of knowledge of robotics. The method will increase the capabilities acquired by students, develop the metacognitive processes required to solve a project-based learning and analyzing their critical thinking. The study is focused on students of any education level and the methodology used consisted in the definition of a "problem" that had to be solved by the students used project-based method. Results will be measured in a group of secondary school students and the possibilities offered by this method will be discussed and compared to other systems of "traditional teaching", obtaining conclusions that could be extrapolated to other technical areas.

Keywords: Robotics, Project-based learning, Critical thinking, Students capabilities

REFERENCES

Stump, G., Hilpert, J., Husman, J., Chung, W., & Kim, W. (2011). Collaborative Learning in Engineering Students: Gender an Achievement. Journal of Engineering Education, 100 (3), pp. 475-497.

Markham, T. (2003). Project-based learning handbook (2nded.). Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education.

Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering Curricula in Early Education: Describing the Landscape on Open Resources. (L. G. Katz, Ed.) Early Childhood Research & Practice.

Anderman, L.H., & Midgley, C. (1998). Motivation and middle school students [ERIC digest]. Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.

Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning.

Bottoms, G., & Webb, L.D. (1998). Connecting the curriculum to “real life.” Breaking Ranks: Making it happen. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED434413)

Karlin, M., & Viani, N. (2001). Project-based learning. Medford, OR: Jackson Education Service District.

Brewster, C., & Fager, J. (2000). Increasing student engagement and motivation: From time-on-task to homework. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning:Definitions and distinctions. The Interdisciplinary Journal ofProblem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.

Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem-based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 12–43.

Downloads

Published

2013-12-31

Issue

Section

Research Article