THE EFFECTS OF EXTRINSIC AND INTRINSIC FACTORS ON TEACHERS’ JOB SATISFACTION IN TALIS 2018
Investigating whether the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on teachers’ dissatisfaction with the teaching profession show variation between countries is crucial, especially given the significant impact on quality of instruction, which is also associated with student performance. In this respect, the main aim of this study is to reveal the effects of a group of variables categorized as extrinsic and intrinsic factors and covered in OECD’s 2018 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). These factors include teacher-student relations, perceived value of teachers in their society, the participation of stakeholders in school decisions, teacher cooperation, teacher salary satisfaction, teacher gender, socioeconomic status (SES) composition of the class, teacher workload, and this study examines TALIS results from Finland, Italy, and Turkey. Structural equation modelling (SEM) were carried out to reveal relationships between extrinsic factors and teacher satisfaction with the profession, to investigate the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on the dimensions of teachers’ satisfaction, and to reveal relationships among the dimensions of teacher satisfaction. In addition, the probability of having dissatisfied teachers with their jobs for each country were estimated by using two consecutive multiple logistic regressions. The results indicated that teachers’ satisfaction with the environment had a positive effect on satisfaction with the profession, which is highest in Finland compared to Turkey and Italy. In addition, when a group of variables are controlled for, teachers’ dissatisfaction with the profession was highest in Finland among the three countries and lowest in Turkey.
Keywords: Teachers’ job dissatisfaction, TALIS 2018, structural equation modelling (SEM)
Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual framework”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 187, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en
Baughman, K. S. (1996). Increasing teacher job satisfaction: A study of the changing role of the secondary principal. American Secondary Education, 24(3), 19-22.
Bolam, R., & McMahon, A. (2004). Literature definitions and models: Towards a conceptual map”, in Day, C. and J. Sachs (eds.), International Handbook on the Continuing Professional Development of Teachers, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
Botha, H. (2007). Relationships between job variables: The moderating effects of support and the mediating effects of job satisfaction, affective commitment and continuance commitment in the support worker industry. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, The University of Waikato.
Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189-1204.
Dorozynska, A. (2016). Teacher job satisfaction primary schools the relation to work environment. Göteborgs University.
Durksen, T. L., Klassen, R. M., & Daniels, L. M. (2017). Motivation and collaboration: The keys to a developmental framework for teachers’ professional learning. Teaching and teacher education, 67, 53-66.
Ferguson, K., Frost, L., & Hall, D. (2012). Predicting teacher anxiety, depression, and job satisfaction. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8, 27–42.
Geiger, T., & Pivovarova, M. (2018). The effects of working conditions on teacher retention. Teachers and Teaching, 24(6), 604–625.
Gkolia, A., Belias, D., & Koustelios, A. (2014). Teacher's job satisfaction and selfefficacy: A review. European Scientific Journal, 10 (22), 321-342.
Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267-71, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.267
Hauber, F. A., & Bruininks, R. H. (1986). Intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction among direct-care staff in residential facilities for mentally retarded people. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46(1), 95-105.
Hirschfeld, R. R. (2000). Does revising the intrinsic and extrinsic subscales of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire short form make a difference? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 255-270, https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970493
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534, https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003499
Iwu, C. G., Ezeuduji, I. O., Iwu, I. C., Ikebuaku, K., & Tengeh, R. K. (2018). Achieving quality education by understanding teacher job satisfaction determinants. Social Sciences, 7(2), 25, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7020025
Johnson, B., Stevens, J. J., & Zvoch, K. (2007). Teachers' perceptions of school climate: A validity study of scores from the revised school level environment questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(5), 833-844, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406299102
Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1-39.
Khazaei, M., Radin, P. & Anbarlou, R. A. (2016) Study of social factors on job satisfaction of teachers in Nahavand city, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n3s3p186
Kim, S. & Yang, S. (2016) Childcare teachers’ job satisfaction: Effects of personality, conflict-handling, and organisational characteristics, Social Behavior and Personality, 44(2), 177–184, https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.2.177
Klassen, R. M., & Anderson, C. J. (2009). How times change: secondary teachers' job satisfaction and dissatisfaction in 1962 and 2007. British Educational Research Journal, 35(5), 745-759. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802688721
Madero, C. (2019) Secondary teacher’s dissatisfaction with the teaching profession in Latin America: the case of Brazil, Chile, and Mexico, Teachers and Teaching, 25 (3), 358-378, https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1587402
Malinen, O.-P., & Savolainen, H. (2016). The effect of perceived school climate and teacher efficacy in behavior management on job satisfaction and burnout: A longitudinal study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.012
Mehmeti, I., & Telaku, M. (2020). Relation of the perception of work environment with job satisfaction: The case of teachers in high schools in the municipality of Prishtina. Thesis, 9(1), 3-33.
Menon, M. E., & Athanasoula-Reppa, A. (2011). Job satisfaction among secondary school teachers: The role of gender and experience. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 435-450, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.614942
Mostafa, T., and Pál, J. (2018). “Science teachers' satisfaction: evidence from the PISA 2015 teacher survey,” in OECD Education Working Papers, 168 (Paris: OECD Publishing). https://doi.org/10.1787/1ecdb4e3-en.
Nyamubi, G. J. (2017) Determinants of secondary school teachers’ job satisfaction in Tanzania, Education Research International, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7282614
OECD (2016a), PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
OECD (2019a). TALIS 2019 technical report. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS_2018_Technical_Report.pdf
OECD (2019b), PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Okeke, Ch. I. & Mtyuda, P. N. (2017). Teacher job dissatisfaction: implications for teacher sustainability and social transformation. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0004
Ouyang, M., & Paprock, K. (2006). Teacher job satisfaction and retention: A comparison study between the US and China. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development international conference, Columbus, OH.
Pallant, J. (2011) SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program. 4th Edition, Allen & Unwin, Berkshire.
Perie, M., Baker, D. P., & Whitener, S. (1997). Job satisfaction among America’s Teachers: Effects of workplace conditions. Background Characteristics, and Teachers Compensation, US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, NCES.
Ramirez, M. J., & Viteri, A. (2016). Third and sixth grade teachers in Latin American and the Caribbean: Characteristics, perceptions and relationship with student learning achievement. Santiago: OREALC/UNESCO.
Randolph, D. S., & Johnson, S. P. (2005). Predicting the effect of extrinsic and intrinsic job satisfaction factors on recruitment and retention of rehabilitation professionals. Journal of Healthcare Management, 50(1), 49-60
Rasku, A., & Kinnunen, U. (2003) Job conditions and wellness among finnish upper secondary school teachers, Psychology and Health, 18(4), 441-456, https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0887044031000147184
Renzulli, L. A., Parrott, H. M., & Beattie, I. R. (2011). Racial mismatch and school type: Teacher satisfaction and retention in charter and traditional public schools. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 23-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710392720
Sahin, F. T., & Sak, R. (2016). A Comparative study of male and female early childhood teachers’ job satisfaction in Turkey. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44, 473–481. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10643-015-0738-x
Sahito, Z., & Vaisanen, P. (2020). A literature review on teachers’ job satisfaction in developing countries: Recommendations and solutions for the enhancement of the job. Review of Education, 8(1), 3-34, https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3159
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 214-12.
Sultana, A., Sarker, M. N. I. & Prodhan, A. S. (2017). Job satisfaction of public and private primary school teachers of Bogra District in Bangladesh. Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 1(1), 41– 46.
Susmitha, G. & Reddy, G. L. (2017) A Study on job satisfaction of teachers working at secondary level, The research journal of social sciences, 8(11), 4–16.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Tašner, V., Žveglič, M., & Čeplak, M. M. (2017). Gender in the teaching profession: university students’ views of teaching as a career. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(2), 47-69.
Taylor, D. T. & Tashakkori, A. (2010) Decision participation and school climate as predictors of job satisfaction and teachers’ sense of efficacy, Journal of Experimental Education, 63(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1995.9943810.
Veldman, I., van Tartwijk, J., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2013). Job satisfaction and teacher-student relationships across the teaching career: Four case studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 55-65.
Yayla, A., Sak, R., Şahin Sak, İ. T., & Taşkın, N. (2018). Comparing the job satisfaction of hourly paid and salaried preschool teachers in Turkey. Education 3-13, 46(7), 814-824.
Copyright (c) 2021 International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) ISSN: 1300-915X
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and permissions
The manuscripts submitted to International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) for publication should be original studies that were not published before or not submitted to anywhere else for publication.
Authors who submit their manuscript to International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) should acknowledge that they agree to transfer the copyright of their studies to IOJPE. All Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
All articles published in International Online Journal of Primary Education (IOJPE) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
Any further distribution or use of content published under CC BY 4.0 must contain the author(s) and the published article’s title, and journal citation. All articles published in IOJPE under a CC BY License may be used for Text and Data Mining purposes, subject to the conditions of the CC BY License terms. The license allows for commercial use. IOJPE allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator.
The journal’s objective is to disseminate articles published are free. Under the Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.00), the journal allows the user to permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, and even use the publication for commercial activities, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Open access is an approach that eases the interdisciplinary communication and encourages cooperation among different disciplines. IOJPE, therefore, contributes to its own field by providing more access to its articles and a more transparent review process.